Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 72/15 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to review whether standard contract terms are prohibited under consumer protection law.

Case Number I CSK 72/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the Second Instance Court's judgment. The plaintiff sought a declaration that specific clauses in a standard contract were prohibited under consumer protection statutes, while the defendant argued the terms were valid. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the legality of the contract terms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 22 ust. 1 Kodeksu o ochronie konsumentów; Art. 66 Kodeksu cywilnego: Standard contract terms are prohibited if they create a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations to the detriment of the consumer.

Keywords

AI generated
standard contract terms consumer protection law prohibited clauses imbalance of rights cassation appeal civil procedure unfair terms

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 22 ust. 1 Kodeksu o ochronie konsumentów
Art. 66 Kodeksu cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated
VI ACa 1538/13
Appeal dismissed; standard form clause invalid due to lack of transparency and consumer interest protection under Civil Code.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 72/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 5 listopada 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Wojciech Katner w sprawie z powództwa Stowarzyszenia "T." w P.‎przeciwko S. Spółce jawnej w L. ‎o uznanie postanowień wzorca umowy za niedozwolone,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 5 listopada 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie‎z dnia 10 czerwca 2014 r., sygn. akt VI ACa 1538/13, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.