Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 6985/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine paternity dispute facts and evidence validity.

Case Number I CSK 6985/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendants against the lower court's judgment denying paternity. The lower court had ruled based on evidence presented during the proceedings without fully addressing specific procedural objections raised by the appellants. The court decided to refer the case back for further examination to ensure all legal arguments and evidentiary issues are properly resolved.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to examine a crucial issue of fact or law, or if the judgment was based on a finding of fact that was not supported by the evidence.

Keywords

AI generated
paternity dispute cassation appeal lower court error evidence examination procedural review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 6985/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 16 marca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Wesołowski w sprawie z powództwa W. P. ‎przeciwko B. P. i M. P.‎przy udziale Prokuratora Rejonowego w Żaganiu‎o zaprzeczenie ojcostwa,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym 16 marca 2023 r. w Izbie Cywilnej w Warszawie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanych‎od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Zielonej Górze‎z 15 lipca 2022 r., sygn. akt VI Ca 537/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE