Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 696/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if ownership of movable property was acquired by prescription.

Case Number I CSK 696/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal to review the lower court's decision on acquiring ownership of movable property through prescription. The applicant challenged the district court's ruling, arguing that the statutory requirements for prescription were not fully met or that the timeline was incorrect. The court decided to remand the case for further examination rather than issuing a final judgment on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 11 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego; Art. 12 Kodeksu cywilnego: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to determine whether the conditions for acquiring ownership of movable property by prescription have been met.

Keywords

AI generated
acquisition of ownership prescription of movable property cassation appeal acceptance Supreme Court review civil law prescription

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 11 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 12 Kodeksu cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 696/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 20 maja 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz w sprawie z wniosku P. K.‎przy uczestnictwie (…)‎o stwierdzenie nabycia własności rzeczy ruchomej przez zasiedzenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 20 maja 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawcy od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 11 października 2018 r., sygn. akt IV Ca (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.