Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 696/15 AI generated

Supreme Court allows inheritance claim against will by admitting new evidence of forgery.

Case Number I CSK 696/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court admitted the cassation complaint and remanded the case for further proceedings. The plaintiff, G. J., sought an inheritance share against the will of D. F., arguing the document was forged, while the defendant maintained its validity. The court decided to accept the appeal because the lower court failed to properly evaluate the evidence of forgery presented by the plaintiff.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may admit a cassation complaint if the lower court failed to assess evidence regarding the authenticity of a will or other legal act.

Keywords

AI generated
inheritance dispute will forgery cassation procedure evidence assessment testamentary capacity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 696/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 20 lipca 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek w sprawie z powództwa G. J. ‎przeciwko D. F. ‎o zachowek,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 20 lipca 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powódki od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 23 kwietnia 2015 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), ‎przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.