Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 676/26 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal regarding adverse possession claim against multiple defendants.

Case Number I CSK 676/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by B.S. and L.S. against the lower court's decision on adverse possession. The applicants argued that the defendants failed to prove continuous possession and good faith acquisition of the property. The court ruled that the cassation appeal must be examined on the merits due to potential violations of property law principles.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 469 k.p.c.; Art. 193 k.c.: The cassation appeal is admissible when the lower court's decision may have violated the provisions of the Civil Code regarding the acquisition of ownership through adverse possession.

Keywords

AI generated
adverse possession ownership acquisition cassation appeal property law good faith acquisition

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 676/26 POSTANOWIENIE 8 lipca 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Władysław Pawlak na posiedzeniu niejawnym 8 lipca 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku B.S. i L.S.‎z udziałem S.K., R.T., Z.T., T.T., M.K., W.K., R.K., M.K., L.K., J.P., M.P., A.G., J.Ł., B.J.,M.G., W.S., H.G., D.B., Z.D. oraz następców prawnych T.P. – T.P.1, A.K., M.S., Ł.P. i A.P.‎o zasiedzenie nieruchomości,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej B.S. i L.S.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Zamościu‎z 8 października 2025 r., I Ca 175/25, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.[SOP]