Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 658/13 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeals regarding property acquisition by prescription against state and municipality claims.

Case Number I CSK 658/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted both cassation appeals filed by the State Treasury and the Municipality of R. regarding a dispute over property acquisition by prescription. The lower court had ruled in favor of the State Treasury, asserting ownership based on the passage of time, while the municipality contested this claim. The court decided to proceed with the review of these appeals to determine the validity of the prescription claim against public entities.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 230 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 231 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept cassation appeals against final judgments involving disputes over property acquisition by prescription, ensuring uniform interpretation of the Civil Code provisions on acquisitive prescription.

Keywords

AI generated
acquisitive prescription property ownership cassation appeal public entities Civil Code state treasury municipal property

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 230 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 231 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 658/13 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 8 lipca 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Strzelczyk w sprawie z wniosku Skarbu Państwa - Prezydenta Miasta R.‎przy uczestnictwie L. D., Z. G., E. G., W. G. i Gminy Miasto R.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia własności nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 8 lipca 2014 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych wnioskodawcy i uczestnika postępowania Gminy ‎Miasto R.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w R.‎z dnia 4 czerwca 2013 r., sygn. akt I Ca […], przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania.