Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 653/13 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to review whether standard contract terms are prohibited under consumer protection law.

Case Number I CSK 653/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the plaintiff's cassation appeal against the appellate court's decision regarding the validity of standard contract terms. The plaintiff argued that specific clauses in the agreement violated consumer protection statutes by creating a significant imbalance between rights and obligations. The court decided to proceed with the review to determine if the terms were legally prohibited under the relevant consumer law provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów; Ustawa o prawie konsumenta: The Supreme Court accepts a cassation appeal to examine whether standard terms in a contract are prohibited under consumer protection legislation when they create a significant imbalance to the detriment of the consumer.

Keywords

AI generated
standard contract terms consumer protection law prohibited clauses significant imbalance cassation appeal consumer rights appellate review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów
Ustawa o prawie konsumenta

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 653/13 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 13 czerwca 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Józef Frąckowiak w sprawie z powództwa J. K.‎przeciwko "T. […] Spółka jawna […]" z siedzibą w S.‎o uznanie postanowień wzorca umowy za niedozwolone,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 13 czerwca 2014 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda‎od postanowienia Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 5 marca 2013 r., sygn. akt VI ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.