Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 6485/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal against civil judgment awarding costs to municipality.

Case Number I CSK 6485/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by A.P. and K.P. against the lower court's judgment. The appellants sought to overturn a decision ordering the Gmina Oświęcim to pay them 2,700 PLN in procedural costs. The court rejected the appeal, upholding the original ruling that the appellants must bear the costs of the cassation proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court dismisses a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment is final and the appeal does not meet statutory grounds for review.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal procedural costs award municipal liability final judgment enforcement civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 680/20
Appeal dismissed; court held that a valid termination notice by one co-owner precludes claims based on the management agreement regarding the sale of the other's share.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 6485/22 POSTANOWIENIE 27 lipca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Wesołowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 27 lipca 2023 r. w Izbie Cywilnej w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa A.P. i K. P.‎przeciwko Gminie Oświęcim‎o zapłatę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej A.P. i K.P.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie‎z 26 listopada 2021 r., I ACa 680/20, 1. odmawia przyjęcia skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania; 2. zasądza od powodów na rzecz pozwanej 2700 (dwa tysiące‎ siedemset) złotych tytułem kosztów postępowania‎ kasacyjnego. [ł.n] P.P.r.g.