Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 6394/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal in commercial debt case where plaintiff failed to prove debt existence.

Case Number I CSK 6394/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Bank spółka akcyjna against the lower court's judgment. The plaintiff, M. M., had sued for payment of a debt but failed to provide sufficient evidence proving the existence and amount of the claimed debt. Consequently, the court ruled that the cassation appeal was inadmissible due to the lack of grounds for re-examination of the final judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The cassation appeal is inadmissible if the judgment is final and the appellant fails to demonstrate a violation of the law or a ground for re-examination under the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal inadmissibility commercial debt dispute burden of proof failure final judgment enforcement Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 6394/22 POSTANOWIENIE 21 lutego 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Góra-Błaszczykowska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 21 lutego 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa M. M.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej Bank spółki akcyjnej w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Warszawie‎z 12 lipca 2022 r., V Ca 1588/20, odmawia przyjęcia skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania.[SOP][ał]