Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 6318/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine damages for breach of contract and non-performance.

Case Number I CSK 6318/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant company against the appellate court's judgment. The case involves a dispute between plaintiffs M. T. and J. T. and defendant B. Spółka Akcyjna regarding the determination and payment of damages resulting from a breach of contract. The court decided to refer the matter back for further proceedings to resolve the specific issues of liability and compensation amounts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment fails to properly apply the law or if the facts are unclear, thereby necessitating a remand for further adjudication on the specific issues of liability and damages.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance breach of contract damages remand for further proceedings corporate liability dispute Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 130/22
Court partially allowed consumer claim for invalid loan contract, awarding interest from date of knowledge of illegality.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 6318/22 POSTANOWIENIE 1 marca 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 1 marca 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa M. T. i J. T.‎przeciwko B. spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej B. spółki akcyjnej w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie‎z 3 czerwca 2022 r., I ACa 130/22, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [PG][ał]