Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 608/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number I CSK 608/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the lower court erred in its legal assessment regarding the debt claim, while the defendant maintained the original ruling was correct. Consequently, the court decided to refer the case back for further examination rather than issuing a final decision on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a material error in applying the law, necessitating a remand for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance material error in law remand for retrial civil procedure code debt dispute Supreme Court jurisdiction legal assessment error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 608/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 11 lutego 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa A. W.‎przeciwko Przedsiębiorstwu Państwowemu "P." w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 11 lutego 2021 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powódki od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 21 stycznia 2020 r., sygn. akt V ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.