Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 577/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether debt claim is barred by limitation period.

Case Number I CSK 577/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal against the appellate court's judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim for payment. The plaintiff argued that the defendants failed to prove the statute of limitations had expired, while the defendants contended the debt was time-barred. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the limitation period applies to the specific debt in question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 245 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to examine whether the claim is barred by the statute of limitations.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations cassation appeal limitation period civil claim Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 245 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 577/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 1 kwietnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz w sprawie z powództwa H. […] spółki z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością w O.‎przeciwko J. B. i M. B.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 1 kwietnia 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanych od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 14 stycznia 2021 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.