Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal against civil court order refusing to convene a meeting of co-owners.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeals filed by several co-owners against the Lower Regional Court's order refusing to convene a meeting. The co-owners argued that the court failed to properly assess their right to demand a gathering for managing shared property, while the opposing party contended the procedural requirements were not met. The court ruled that the lower court correctly applied the law by determining the specific conditions under which a meeting could be legally convened.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 100 ust. 1 k.c.; Art. 101 k.c.: A co-owner's right to demand a meeting of co-owners is subject to strict statutory conditions regarding the purpose and necessity of the gathering, and a court order refusing such a meeting is valid if the statutory prerequisites are not fulfilled.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
I CSK 5763/22 POSTANOWIENIE 29 listopada 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Beata Janiszewska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 29 listopada 2023 r. w Warszawiew sprawie z wniosku Spółdzielni w Krakowiez udziałem G.A., M.F., Z.B., A.B., L.B., U.F., P.B. i Y.F.o zasiedzenie,na skutek skargi kasacyjnej G.A., M.F., L.B., U.F., P.B. i Y.F.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Krakowiez 17 lutego 2022 r., II Ca 1472/21, odmawia przyjęcia skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania. (J.T.) [ms]