Supreme Court allows appeal to terminate co-ownership due to lack of consent from all owners.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by I. K. against the Lower Regional Court's order to terminate co-ownership. The court found that the lower court erred by not properly assessing the necessity of unanimous consent for such a significant change in property rights. Consequently, the appeal is admitted for further examination to determine if the statutory conditions for terminating co-ownership without full agreement were met.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 10 ust. 1 Kodeks cywilny; Art. 10 ust. 2 Kodeks cywilny: The termination of co-ownership requires the unanimous consent of all co-owners, and a court order alone cannot effectuate this change without satisfying the strict statutory prerequisites for dissolution of the joint ownership regime.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
I CSK 57/25 POSTANOWIENIE 3 lutego 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Piotr Telusiewicz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 3 lutego 2026 r. w Warszawiew sprawie z wniosku V. B.z udziałem I. K.o zniesienie współwłasności,na skutek skargi kasacyjnej I. K.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Toruniuz 11 października 2023 r., VIII Ca 149/23, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [a.ł]