Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 556/25 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal in debt dispute where plaintiff proves debt existence and defendant fails to rebut.

Case Number I CSK 556/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by a shareholder company against a lower court judgment. The plaintiff successfully demonstrated the existence of a debt, while the defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence to refute the claim. Consequently, the court decided to proceed with the case for further adjudication rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The cassation court accepts an appeal when the lower court's judgment is based on a violation of the law regarding the assessment of evidence or the application of substantive rules, provided the appeal meets the statutory requirements for admissibility.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal admissibility debt existence proof evidence assessment violation shareholder company plaintiff civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 556/25 POSTANOWIENIE 28 kwietnia 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Roman Trzaskowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 28 kwietnia 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa P. spółki akcyjnej w W.‎przeciwko J.W.‎o zapłatę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej P. spółki akcyjnej w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie‎z 12 września 2024 r., VII AGa 92/24, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. (K.L.)