Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 556/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether a standard bank contract clause is prohibited.

Case Number I CSK 556/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff sought a declaration that a specific clause in the standard loan agreement was prohibited under consumer protection laws. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the validity of the contractual term.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego; Art. 22 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review whether a standard contract term violates mandatory provisions protecting the weaker party.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal standard contract terms prohibited clauses consumer protection banking agreements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 22 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 556/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 kwietnia 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa T. Ż. i K. W.-W.‎przeciwko […] Bank S.A. w W.‎o uznanie postanowienia wzorca umowy za niedozwolone,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 24 kwietnia 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 13 grudnia 2017 r., sygn. akt VII ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE