Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 548/13 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law regarding the claim for payment.

Case Number I CSK 548/13
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute concerns a claim for payment between the plaintiff S. M. and the defendant P. S.A. in W., where the appellate court had previously ruled on the merits. The court decided to refer the case back for further examination to determine if the lower court properly applied the relevant legal provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court accepts a cassation appeal to review whether the lower court committed a procedural error or misapplied the law in the judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal claim for payment misapplication of law procedural error Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 548/13 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 30 kwietnia 2014 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Wojciech Katner w sprawie z powództwa S. M.‎przeciwko I. […] S.A. w W.‎obecnie P. […] S.A. w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 30 kwietnia 2014 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 12 czerwca 2013 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.