Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 533/19 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt payment dispute.

Case Number I CSK 533/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the lower court erred in its assessment of the debt obligation, while the defendant maintained the original ruling was legally sound. Consequently, the court decided to remit the case for further examination rather than issuing a final decision on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a material error in applying the law, necessitating remittal for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance material error in law application remittal for retrial civil debt dispute Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 533/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 31 lipca 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz w sprawie z powództwa A. B.‎przeciwko P. P.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 31 lipca 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 16 października 2018 r., sygn. akt VI ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.