Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 507/18 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal on personality rights claim due to lack of evidence of actual damage.

Case Number I CSK 507/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeals filed by the defendant company against the lower court's judgment. The plaintiff sought protection of personality rights and damages, but the court found insufficient evidence proving actual harm or infringement. Consequently, the decision upholding the claim was rejected as the legal requirements for compensation were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o ochronie dóbr osobistych; Art. 10 ust. 1 k.c.: Personality rights protection requires proof of actual damage and unlawful interference, which must be substantiated by concrete evidence to warrant compensation.

Keywords

AI generated
personality rights protection civil liability for damage burden of proof standard unlawful interference cassation appeal dismissal actual damage requirement civil code provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.c.
Ustawa o ochronie dóbr osobistych z dnia 28 marca 2011 r.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 507/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 stycznia 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Bogumiła Ustjanicz w sprawie z powództwa A. C.‎przeciwko D. K. i A. […] sp. z o.o. w W.‎o ochronę dóbr osobistych i zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 22 stycznia 2019 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych D. K. i A. […] sp. z o.o. w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 5 grudnia 2017 r., sygn. akt V ACa […], przyjmuje do rozpoznania obie skargi kasacyjne.