Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 494/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to review contract clause validity in consumer dispute.

Case Number I CSK 494/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff sought to have a standard contract clause declared invalid, while the defendant argued for its enforceability. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than ruling on the merits immediately.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to examine a claim regarding the invalidity of a standard contract clause.

Keywords

AI generated
standard contract clause consumer protection invalidity of terms cassation appeal Supreme Court jurisdiction civil procedure unfair terms

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 494/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 21 marca 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Dończyk w sprawie z powództwa G. P.‎przeciwko C. S.A. w W.‎o uznanie postanowień wzorca umowy za niedozwolone,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 21 marca 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 29 marca 2018 r., sygn. akt VII AGa […], ‎przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE