Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 487/25 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine ownership acquisition by adverse possession against opposing parties.

Case Number I CSK 487/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by M.D. against the Lower Regional Court's decision in Świdnica. The case involves a dispute over the acquisition of property rights through adverse possession among M.D., W.D., D.P., and A.P. The court decided to refer the matter for further examination to resolve the conflicting claims regarding ownership transfer.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision concerns the determination of ownership rights acquired through adverse possession and the facts require clarification.

Keywords

AI generated
adverse possession ownership acquisition cassation appeal property rights adverse possession claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 487/25 POSTANOWIENIE 30 stycznia 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Grzesiowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 30 stycznia 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku M.D.‎z udziałem W.D., D.P. i A.P.‎o stwierdzenie zasiedzenia własności nieruchomości,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej M.D.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Świdnicy‎z 27 sierpnia 2024 r., II Ca 1053/23, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. (G.N.-J.)[SOP]