Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 486/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 486/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff sought a declaration that the bank's refusal to pay constituted unjust enrichment, while the bank argued the debt was valid. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the legal basis for the bank's refusal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych; Ustawa o księgowości: When a bank refuses payment without legal basis, the court must examine whether the refusal creates a claim for unjust enrichment under civil law principles.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment bank refusal cassation appeal civil liability payment obligation

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 486/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 25 kwietnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mariusz Łodko w sprawie z powództwa D. S.‎przeciwko […] Bank S.A. w W.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 25 kwietnia 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 22 grudnia 2020 r., sygn. akt V ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.