Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 4636/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation complaints against a judgment ordering payment and establishing facts in a civil dispute.

Case Number I CSK 4636/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted two cassation complaints filed by plaintiffs against a lower court judgment ordering payment and fact-finding. The plaintiffs argued that the first-instance court erred in its assessment of evidence and legal application regarding their claims against the defendant bank. Consequently, the Court decided to admit both complaints for further examination to review the substantive errors alleged.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may admit cassation complaints if the lower court committed an error in the assessment of evidence or in the application of substantive law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation procedure error in evidence assessment application of substantive law civil dispute payment order fact-finding error admission of complaint

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 4636/22 POSTANOWIENIE 24 lipca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Dariusz Pawłyszcze po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym 24 lipca 2023 r. w Warszawie wniosków M. Ś. i W. Ś. oraz Bank spółki akcyjnej w W. o przyjęcie do rozpoznania skargi kasacyjnej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie z 21 lutego 2022 r., I ACa 268/21, wydanego w sprawie z powództwa M. Ś. i W. Ś.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę i ustalenie, przyjmuje obydwie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania. (A.T.)[ł.n]