Supreme Court dismisses request to amend previous ruling on necessary road access for municipal property.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court rejected the applicants' request to amend its February 13, 2026, decision regarding necessary road access. The applicants, representing a municipality and private parties, argued for procedural corrections to the original ruling. The court declined to alter the precedent, maintaining that the original decision on access rights was final and unchangeable under current procedural rules.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 375 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 376 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court's final ruling on the establishment of a necessary road is binding and cannot be amended upon subsequent application by interested parties.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
I CSK 4530/23 POSTANOWIENIE 22 maja 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Mariusz Załucki na posiedzeniu niejawnym 22 maja 2026 r. w Warszawiew sprawie z wniosku K.K.z udziałem Gminy B., J.O., P.C. i M.C.o ustanowienie drogi koniecznej,w przedmiocie wniosku K.K., M.C. i J.O. o uzupełnienie postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 13 lutego 2026 r., I CSK 4530/23, oddala wniosek.[SOP]