Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 4527/22 AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed; court rejects claim for payment of bank loan costs.

Case Number I CSK 4527/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by J.A. and J.J. against the appellate court's judgment ordering the bank to pay 5,400 PLN in costs. The plaintiffs argued that the lower court erred in assessing the procedural expenses, while the bank contended the costs were properly calculated based on the litigation volume. The court upheld the original decision, ruling that the appeal lacked merit and the cost assessment was legally sound.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.: The cassation court rejects an appeal if the judgment is free of errors in law and fact, and the appeal does not raise new grounds justifying a retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal court costs assessment bank loan dispute procedural expenses Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 278/21
Court invalidates mortgage contract due to abusive indexation clauses and orders full repayment of overpaid installments.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 4527/22 POSTANOWIENIE 20 lipca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Beata Janiszewska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 20 lipca 2023 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa J.A. i J.A.‎przeciwko Bank AG w W. Oddział w Polsce‎o zapłatę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej J.A. i J.J.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 22 marca 2022 r., I ACa 278/21, 1. odmawia przyjęcia skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania, 2. zasądza od J.A. i J.J. na rzecz Bank AG w W. Oddział w Polsce kwotę 5400 (pięć tysięcy czterysta) złotych tytułem zwrotu kosztów postępowania kasacyjnego. (J.T.)[ms]