Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 4463/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal due to lack of reasoning in the request to admit the appeal. The court orders the appellant's lawyer to supplement the formal requirements of the cassation petition. The decision highlights the necessity of providing a reasoned argument for admitting a cassation appeal. The court rejects the appeal because the request to admit it lacks sufficient justification. The appellant must provide a reasoned argument for the appeal to be considered. The court emphasizes the importance of formal requirements in cassation proceedings. The decision ensures procedural fairness by requiring a reasoned request for admission. The court dismisses the appeal due to the lack of a reasoned argument. The appellant must provide a reasoned argument for the appeal to be considered. The court emphasizes the importance of formal requirements in cassation proceedings.

Case Number I CSK 4463/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by E. L. against the District Court in Kalisz, ordering the appellant's representative to supplement the formal requirements of the petition. The appellant argued that the lower court's refusal to admit the appeal was unjustified, while the opposing party contended that the request lacked the necessary reasoning to warrant admission. The court decided to dismiss the appeal because the request to admit the cassation petition failed to provide a reasoned argument as required by law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 388 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 389 § 1 k.p.c.: A request to admit a cassation appeal must be reasoned; failure to provide a justification for admission results in the dismissal of the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal admission requirements reasoned argument Supreme Court procedural fairness formal requirements civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 388 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 389 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 4463/22 POSTANOWIENIE 15 września 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Dariusz Dończyk na posiedzeniu niejawnym 15 września 2023 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa E. L.‎przeciwko H. L. reprezentowanej przez kuratora ‎M. P.‎przy udziale Prokuratora Rejonowego w Kaliszu‎o ustalenie macierzyństwa,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej E. L.‎od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Kaliszu ‎z 11 marca 2022 r., II Ca 326/21, zwraca Sądowi Okręgowemu w Kaliszu skargę kasacyjną powoda celem wezwania pełnomocnika powoda do uzupełnienia wymagań formalnych skargi kasacyjnej polegającego na braku w niej uzasadnienia wniosku o przyjęcie skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania. [PG][ms]