Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 4425/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses defendant's evidence request for lack of legal interest and procedural justification.

Case Number I CSK 4425/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the defendant's motion for evidence submitted on October 20, 2022, regarding a claim for payment between two companies. The plaintiff argued the defendant sought to introduce new facts to undermine their case, while the defendant claimed the evidence was necessary to clarify disputed contractual terms. The court ruled that the defendant lacked a legitimate interest in the proceedings and failed to demonstrate why the evidence was indispensable for resolving the dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 398 § 2 k.p.c.; art. 398 § 3 k.p.c.: A party's request for evidence is inadmissible if they cannot demonstrate a legitimate interest in the proceedings or if the evidence is not indispensable for resolving the dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
legitimate interest evidence request procedural justification indispensable evidence dismissal of motion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 398 § 2 k.p.c.
(art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.).
art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c
(art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 4425/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 16 listopada 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Władysław Pawlak w sprawie z powództwa A. spółki akcyjnej w K.‎przeciwko I. spółce z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 16 listopada 2022 r., w przedmiocie wniosku dowodowego strony pozwanej odrzuca wniosek dowodowy strony pozwanej zawarty w piśmie procesowym z dnia 20 października 2022 r. (art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.).