Plaintiffs' cassation appeal against the appellate court's dismissal of their claim for bank account establishment and payment is allowed. The Supreme Court allows the cassation appeal to be heard on the merits. The court rejects the cassation appeal and remands the case for further proceedings. The court finds the lower court's decision legally sound and dismisses the cassation appeal. The court allows the cassation appeal to proceed to a full hearing on the merits.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court allowed the cassation appeal filed by plaintiffs D. N. and M. N. against the Warsaw Court of Appeal's decision dismissing their claims for bank account establishment and payment. The plaintiffs argued that the lower court erred in its procedural handling and substantive assessment of their financial disputes with the defendant bank. The court decided to accept the appeal for further examination because the lower court's judgment did not definitively resolve the legal issues raised by the plaintiffs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The cassation appeal is accepted for further examination when the lower court's judgment fails to address the substantive legal issues raised by the appellant, thereby leaving the dispute unresolved.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
I CSK 442/24 POSTANOWIENIE 12 lutego 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Piotr Telusiewicz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 12 lutego 2025 r. w Warszawiew sprawie z powództwa D. N. i M. N.przeciwko Bank […] spółce akcyjnej w W.o ustalenie i zapłatę, ewentualnie o zapłatę, ewentualnie o ustalenie, ewentualnie o zapłatę i ustalenie,na skutek skargi kasacyjnej D. N. i M. N.od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie z 10 lipca 2023 r., V ACa 408/22, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.[a.ł]