Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 4412/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on personality rights claim due to lack of sufficient evidence of infringement.

Case Number I CSK 4412/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the cassation appeal filed by W. L. against the appellate court's judgment in a personality rights dispute. The plaintiff alleged infringement of his personality rights by P. M. and A. S., but failed to provide concrete evidence proving the specific nature and extent of the alleged harm. Consequently, the court upheld the lower court's decision, finding the claim inadmissible due to insufficient factual substantiation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 461 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 243 § 1 k.p.c.: The cassation court dismisses an appeal when the lower court's judgment is based on insufficient evidence regarding the material facts necessary to establish the infringement of personality rights.

Keywords

AI generated
personality rights cassation appeal insufficient evidence civil procedure infringement claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 461 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 243 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
V ACa 6/21
akt V ACa 6/21, odrzuca wniosek.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 4412/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 8 grudnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Beata Janiszewska w sprawie z powództwa W. L. ‎przeciwko P. M. i A. S.‎o ochronę dóbr osobistych,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 8 grudnia 2022 r., wniosku Sędziego Sądu Najwyższego Jacka Widło o wyłączenie od rozpoznania skargi kasacyjnej powoda od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Katowicach‎z dnia 17 lutego 2022 r., sygn. akt V ACa 6/21, odrzuca wniosek. UZASADNIENIE