Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 441/24 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to distinguish property rights between co-owners regarding specific land parcels.

Case Number I CSK 441/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the cassation appeal filed by R. J. and M. W. against the Regional Court's decision in Kielce. The parties contested the precise legal boundaries and ownership distinctions of specific land parcels within a shared property. The court ruled that the lower court failed to adequately address the specific arguments regarding the separation of rights, necessitating a remand for further clarification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 365 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 366 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision lacks a proper basis in law or fails to address essential arguments regarding the distinction of property rights among co-owners.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance co-ownership property rights boundary distinction Supreme Court jurisdiction property law separation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 365 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 366 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 441/24 POSTANOWIENIE 6 listopada 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Ewa Stefańska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 6 listopada 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku R. J. i M. W. ‎z udziałem K. K. ‎o rozgraniczenie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej R. J. i M. W. ‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Kielcach‎z 16 czerwca 2023 r., II Ca 230/21 (II WSC 34/23), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [SOP]r.g.