Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 435/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 435/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff sought a declaration that the bank's refusal to return funds constituted unjust enrichment, while the bank argued the funds were lawfully acquired. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine the specific circumstances of the funds' origin and transfer.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o prawie zamówieniowym publicznym; ustawa o prawie zamówieniowym publicznym: When a public authority refuses to return funds based on a specific legal basis, the court must examine whether the refusal violates the principle of unjust enrichment under the relevant civil code provisions.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment public procurement law cassation appeal bank refusal funds recovery

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 435/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 8 kwietnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Zawistowski w sprawie z powództwa B. B. i A. B.‎przeciwko […] Bank […] spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 8 kwietnia 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 11 lutego 2021 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.