Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 430/20 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's payment obligation exists.

Case Number I CSK 430/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the appellate court's judgment. The core dispute involves whether the bank is legally obligated to make a specific payment to the plaintiffs. The court decided to refer the case back for further examination to clarify the factual and legal basis of the alleged debt.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment is based on a violation of the law or if the facts are unclear, requiring the case to be remanded for further proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance bank payment obligation violation of law remittal for retrial civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 430/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 17 lutego 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z powództwa O. Ż. i G. Ż.‎przeciwko (...) Bank S.A. w W.‎o zapłatę i ustalenie ewentualnie o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 17 lutego 2021 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (...)‎z dnia 27 listopada 2019 r., sygn. akt V ACa (...), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.