Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 43/26 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal against appellate court judgment in payment dispute case.

Case Number I CSK 43/26
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the Bank's cassation appeal against the Szczecin Court of Appeal's judgment. The lower court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, J. K. and M. K., ordering the Bank to pay a specific sum. The Court of Cassation found errors in the application of law or procedure that warranted remanding the case for further review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a violation of the law or a procedural error affecting the outcome of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal payment dispute violation of law procedural error remand for review civil procedure Supreme Court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 43/26 POSTANOWIENIE 27 marca 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Piotr Telusiewicz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 27 marca 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa J. K. i M. K.‎przeciwko Bankowi spółce akcyjnej w W. o zapłatę,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej Banku spółki akcyjnej w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Szczecinie‎z 10 września 2025 r., I ACa 338/24, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [r.g.]