Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 43/15 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number I CSK 43/15
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment in a debt claim. The defendant argued that the lower court erred in its legal assessment regarding the debt's validity or calculation. Consequently, the court decided to remit the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court committed a violation of the law affecting the outcome, requiring the case to be remitted for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance violation of law debt claim dispute remittal for retrial civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 231/14
Unfair competition claim dismissed because defendant did not perform services that could be part of sales margin.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 43/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 października 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Pietrzykowski w sprawie z powództwa J. M.‎przeciwko A. S.A. w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 22 października 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Rzeszowie‎z dnia 25 września 2014 r., sygn. akt I ACa 231/14, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.