Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 4176/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal against civil judgment regarding payment dispute between individuals and a bank.

Case Number I CSK 4176/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the bank against the appellate court's judgment ordering payment. The dispute involved a civil claim for payment between private individuals and a joint-stock company, with the appellant arguing against the lower court's ruling. The court rejected the cassation grounds, upholding the final decision on the merits of the payment obligation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court dismisses a cassation appeal if the appeal does not meet the statutory requirements for admissibility or if the lower court's decision is correct in law and fact.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal payment dispute joint-stock company civil procedure dismissed appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 296/21
Court allows consumer claim against bank for invalid indexed mortgage contract, ordering restitution of overpaid amounts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 4176/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 października 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jacek Widło w sprawie z powództwa A. B. i A. D.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.o zapłatę na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 26 października 2022 r. na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Białymstoku z dnia 21 stycznia 2022 r., sygn. akt I ACa 296/21 na skutek żądania SSN X. Y. o wyłączenie go od udziału w orzekaniu w sprawie wyłącza Sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X. Y. od rozpoznania sprawy.