Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 4031/22 AI generated

Supreme Court excludes judge from hearing cassation appeal due to conflict of interest involving client's bank.

Case Number I CSK 4031/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court excluded Judge X.Y. from adjudicating the cassation appeal against the lower court's judgment. The conflict arose because the appellant's client, B.K., is a shareholder in the defendant bank, which is the opposing party in the underlying dispute. The court ruled that this personal stake created an unavoidable conflict of interest, necessitating the judge's withdrawal to ensure impartiality.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 239 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 240 ust. 1 k.p.c.: A judge must recuse themselves if they have a personal interest in the outcome of the case, such as being a shareholder in a party to the litigation.

Keywords

AI generated
conflict of interest judicial recusal shareholder status cassation appeal impartiality requirement Supreme Court party interest

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 239 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 240 ust. 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 4031/22 POSTANOWIENIE 29 sierpnia 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Roman Trzaskowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 29 sierpnia 2023 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa B.K. i S. K.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę,‎na skutek żądania sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X.Y.‎wyłączenia od rozpoznania skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Gdańsku‎z 28 lutego 2022 r., I ACa 983/21, wyłącza sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X.Y. od orzekania w sprawie. (K.L.)[ł.n]