Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 39/25 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to distinguish property rights between co-owners following lower court ruling.

Case Number I CSK 39/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by U.B. and H.B. against the Sieradz District Court's decision to delimit property rights. The applicants argued that the lower court failed to properly distinguish their respective shares in the disputed real estate. The Court decided to remand the case for further proceedings to address the specific legal issues raised by the parties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to distinguish property rights between co-owners or if the decision lacks a reasoned explanation regarding the delimitation of shares.

Keywords

AI generated
property rights delimitation co-ownership shares cassation appeal acceptance real estate dispute Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 39/25 POSTANOWIENIE 16 maja 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 16 maja 2025 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku S.B. i B.B.‎z udziałem U.B. i H.B.‎o rozgraniczenie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej U.B. i H.B.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Sieradzu I Wydział Cywilny‎z 15 maja 2024 r., I Ca 271/23, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [M.O.][a.ł]