Supreme Court allows appeal to establish servitude of passage between private parties.

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by I.W. and R.W. against the Lower Regional Court's refusal to establish a servitude of passage. The plaintiffs argued that their property access was legally blocked, while the defendant E. company contended that no legal basis existed for such an easement. The court decided to proceed with the case because the lower court's decision lacked sufficient reasoning regarding the statutory requirements for establishing a servitude.