Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 3897/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to distinguish between different types of legal claims in civil proceedings.

Case Number I CSK 3897/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the applicant against the District Court's ruling. The case involves a dispute where the parties sought to clarify the boundaries between distinct legal claims. The court decided to proceed with the review to determine the precise legal characterization of the issues at hand.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to distinguish between different types of legal claims, thereby affecting the correct application of substantive law.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance distinguishing legal claims civil procedure law substantive law application legal characterization error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 3897/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 29 listopada 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Ewa Stefańska w sprawie z wniosku W. K.‎z udziałem M. K., A. H., V. K., M. K., I. L.‎o rozgraniczenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 29 listopada 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawcy ‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Katowicach‎z dnia 27 czerwca 2019 r., sygn. akt IV Ca 998/18, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.