Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 389/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal in commercial dispute over bank account payments and contractual obligations.

Case Number I CSK 389/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a shareholder against a bank and another company regarding a payment dispute. The lower courts ruled that the plaintiff failed to prove the specific contractual basis for the claimed payments. Consequently, the court upheld the final judgment against the plaintiff's arguments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The cassation court dismisses an appeal when the final judgment correctly applies the law and the facts are established without error, leaving no grounds for intervention.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal commercial dispute payment obligation shareholder rights bank contract final judgment dismissed appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 389/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 18 marca 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz w sprawie z powództwa C. […] spółki akcyjnej w W.‎przeciwko […] Bank spółce akcyjnej w P. i P. spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 18 marca 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powódki od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 26 listopada 2020 r., sygn. akt I AGa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania