Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 3848/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 3848/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the appellate court's judgment. The core dispute involves whether the plaintiff's claim for unjust enrichment is valid given the bank's specific refusal to pay. The court decided to proceed with the case to clarify the legal basis for the bank's refusal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 405 k.c.; Art. 406 k.c.: The court established that a claim for unjust enrichment requires proof of a benefit without legal ground, and the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff to demonstrate the absence of a legal basis for the benefit.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment cassation appeal civil procedure burden of proof bank liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 405 k.c.
Art. 406 k.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 525/21
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove oral trust agreement despite conflicting evidence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 3848/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 3 marca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa M. G. i T. G.‎przeciwko Bank spółka akcyjna w W. ‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym 3 marca 2023 r. w Izbie Cywilnej w Warszawie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie‎z 27 października 2021 r., sygn. akt I ACa 525/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE