Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 378/16 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to distinguish between different types of civil liability claims.

Case Number I CSK 378/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the applicant against the District Court's ruling. The applicant sought to distinguish between specific civil liability claims, while the opposing party argued for a unified interpretation. The court decided to allow the appeal to enable a proper examination of the legal distinction between the claims.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to distinguish between different types of civil liability claims, thereby violating the principle of legal certainty.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance civil liability distinction legal certainty principle Supreme Court review procedural error correction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 378/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 grudnia 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z wniosku L. L.‎przy uczestnictwie M. K., K. W., G. B., J. K. i Z. K.‎o rozgraniczenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 28 grudnia 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawcy ‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 20 października 2015 r., sygn. akt V Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.