Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 3753/25 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on easement prescription claim due to lack of continuous public use evidence.

Case Number I CSK 3753/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal regarding a claim for the prescription of a servitude of passage. The appellant argued that continuous use by their company established a legal right, while the lower court found insufficient evidence of uninterrupted public use over the statutory period. The court upheld the dismissal because the burden of proof for continuous use was not met by the appellant's submissions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.c.; Art. 10 ust. 2 k.c.: A servitude is acquired by prescription only if the use is continuous, public, and undisturbed for the statutory period, which requires clear evidence of uninterrupted exercise by the claimant.

Keywords

AI generated
prescription of servitude continuous public use burden of proof easement acquisition civil law prescription

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.c.
Art. 10 ust. 2 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 3753/25 POSTANOWIENIE 16 kwietnia 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Wesołowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 16 kwietnia 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku O. spółki akcyjnej w T.‎z udziałem M.W.‎o zasiedzenie służebności przesyłu,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej O. spółki akcyjnej w T.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Krośnie‎z 6 lutego 2025 r., I Ca 231/24,M.L. przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.[SOP]