Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I CSK 372/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal on procedural grounds, rejecting claim for settlement of land dispute.

Case Number I CSK 372/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by J.T., T.T., and T.T. against the Lower Regional Court's decision in a land settlement dispute. The appellants argued for the resolution of the conflict involving Gmina S. and other parties, but the court found no merit in their procedural objections. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the costs of the cassation proceedings were borne by the participants themselves.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.: The cassation appeal is inadmissible if it is not based on a violation of the law or a procedural error, and the costs of the cassation proceedings are borne by the participants.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal procedural inadmissibility land settlement dispute costs of proceedings Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 372/23 POSTANOWIENIE 23 kwietnia 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Dariusz Zawistowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 23 kwietnia 2024 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku J.T., T.T. i T.T.‎z udziałem Gminy S., A.S., Ł.T., T.S. i K.W.‎o zasiedzenie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej J.T.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Krośnie‎z 21 marca 2022 r., I Ca 436/21, 1. odmawia przyjęcia skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania 2. koszty postępowania kasacyjnego uczestnicy postępowania ponoszą we własnym zakresie. sp [ms]