Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 3590/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether bank's debt claim is validly established.

Case Number I CSK 3590/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The case involves a dispute where the plaintiffs seek payment and confirmation of a debt owed by the defendant bank. The court decided to refer the matter for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment contains a violation of the law regarding the establishment of the claim.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance bank debt claim violation of law civil procedure code payment obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 642/21
Court partially allows debt claim against bank, suspending payment until plaintiff offers security or repayment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 3590/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 16 grudnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa W. R. i J. R.‎przeciwko Bankowi spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę i ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 16 grudnia 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Szczecinie‎z dnia 29 grudnia 2021 r., sygn. akt I ACa 642/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE