Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 358/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Case Number I CSK 358/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant bank against the appellate court's judgment. The core dispute involves whether the plaintiff's claim for payment constitutes unjust enrichment given the bank's specific refusal grounds. The court decided to remand the case for further examination to clarify the factual basis of the bank's refusal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych; Ustawa o księgowości: When a bank refuses payment based on specific contractual or legal grounds, the claimant must prove the absence of a legal basis for the debt to establish unjust enrichment.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment bank refusal cassation appeal payment obligation civil procedure

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 358/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 13 maja 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Grzegorz Misiurek w sprawie z powództwa E. D. i R. D.‎przeciwko […] Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 13 maja 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 3 lutego 2021 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.