Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 357/25 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible because the prosecutor's entry into proceedings was procedurally improper.

Case Number I CSK 357/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court declared the prosecutor's entry into the cassation proceedings inadmissible, rejecting the appeal filed by the company. The plaintiffs sought to establish a claim against the defendant company, but the court found the procedural step of the prosecutor joining the case violated statutory requirements. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without a merits review due to this fundamental procedural defect.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 389 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.: The entry of the prosecutor into cassation proceedings is inadmissible if the conditions for such entry are not met or if the prosecutor lacks standing to intervene in the specific type of dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural inadmissibility prosecutor standing cassation proceedings procedural defect supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 389 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 357/25 POSTANOWIENIE 21 października 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Ewa Stefańska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 21 października 2025 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa A. R. i K.R.‎przeciwko P. spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie i zapłatę, uznaje wstąpienie Prokuratora do postępowania kasacyjnego za niedopuszczalne. (M.T.)[a.ł]