Supreme Court allows cassation appeal regarding refusal to register land ownership transfer in public deed registry.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court admitted the cassation appeal filed by H.G. and Z.G. against the Lower Court's refusal to register their land ownership transfer. The appellants argued that the lower court incorrectly applied procedural rules regarding the submission of documents to the Land Registry, while the opposing party contended the refusal was justified due to missing formalities. The court decided to proceed with the appeal because the lower court's reasoning on the procedural defect was insufficiently substantiated under the relevant civil procedure code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 230 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 10 § 1 k.w.: The cassation court must admit an appeal when the lower court fails to adequately justify a procedural refusal to register a right transfer, requiring a substantive review of the registry's acceptance criteria.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
I CSK 3569/25 POSTANOWIENIE 27 lutego 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 27 lutego 2026 r. w Warszawiew sprawie z wniosku Gminy Ł.z udziałem H.G., Z.G., E.M. i Z.D.o wpis w dziale II księgi wieczystej […],na skutek skargi kasacyjnej H.G. i Z.G.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Łodzi z 25 kwietnia 2025 r., III Ca 859/24, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. [M.O.][SOP]