Supreme Court dismisses appeals to reject easement prescription claim due to lack of continuous use evidence.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeals filed by M.D. and T.S. against the Lower Court's refusal to recognize the prescription of an easement. The appellants argued that the easement had been established through long-term use, while the respondent D.S. contended that the required continuity and openness of use were not proven. The court ruled that the evidence presented failed to meet the statutory requirements for establishing a servitude by prescription under Polish civil law.