Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 3537/22 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine procedural errors in civil judgment regarding bank debt.

Case Number I CSK 3537/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The case involves a dispute over payment and the determination of obligations between a plaintiff and a bank. The court decided to refer the matter for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment violates the law or contains a procedural error affecting the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance procedural error review civil procedure law bank debt dispute Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 402/21
Court partially allowed consumer claim against bank, adjusting interest dates based on bank's right of retention.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I CSK 3537/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 października 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa K. Z.‎przeciwko Bankowi spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę i ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 24 października 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Białymstoku‎z dnia 30 grudnia 2021 r., sygn. akt I ACa 402/21, przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.